Stanford professor: peer review was never one-way — authors rebut AI reviews too
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-10-29
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje pushes back on criticism of AI-assisted peer review: reviewing is not a one-way street. Authors can rebut both human and AI reviews in a continuous back-and-forth; "unbiased" review will never exist, and AI adds real value in that process.
More from AGI Musings
- Writing about AI publicly exposes just how bad some respected people's OOD reasoning is — jd_pressman · 2026-10-29
- zetalyrae: alignment debates assume ASI can 'enumerate the real numbers' — zetalyrae · 2026-10-29
- 'A bad napkin sketch beats any prompt': creators lack the language to brief AI agents — AIFlow_ML · 2026-10-29
- NISCO and Huawei deploy world's first swarm-intelligence industrial cluster for steelmaking — yogthos · 2026-10-29
- New preprint measures 'articulation gaps': how much knowledge in humans and AI is tacit — sanmikoyejo · 2026-10-29
- The Rule-Following Paradox: Why Law Can't Be Fully Coded — sanmikoyejo · 2026-10-29