AI reviews now beat the average human reviewer, especially in cross-disciplinary work
bidumit · x · 2026-10-29
bidumit pushes back in a discussion with Anshul Kundaje: on average, AI-generated reviews are already better than those from the average human reviewer, especially in esoteric or cross-disciplinary areas. He still recommends reading the paper and writing your own review first, then augmenting it with AI.
More from Research
- Prove2Me formalizes 2,000+ operations research papers in Lean 4 with Claude agents, 64% done — ChrSzegedy · 2026-10-30
- 1-16 Coding Agents Tested: Teams Burn 36% More Tokens to Save 5 Hours — kyang8093 · 2026-10-30
- Noninvasive BCI lets unresponsive ICU patients communicate via brainwaves — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-30
- Adobe's EditAgent routes image edits across editors with evidence-based listwise judging — adobe · 2026-10-30
- AskStream benchmark shows models struggle to ask questions proactively in streaming video — CASIA · 2026-10-30
- Co-Design Bench: top coding agents fully satisfy only 26.4% of real-user tasks — Qwen · 2026-10-30