AI-assisted peer review debate: does it make mediocre reviewers worse?
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-10-29
Researcher djhshih argued that AI-using reviewers confidently critique areas they know nothing about and become harsher—AI makes good reviewers better but average ones worse. Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje sharply replied "This is 100% false," fueling an ongoing academic debate over AI-assisted peer review.
More from AGI Musings
- Why the "human in the loop" can't be removed: a Thomist metaphysics take on AI transformation — curious_vii · 2026-10-29
- AI exploit agent's API bill revealed: ~$40K per attack chain, slides two months apart — moyix · 2026-10-29
- What happens when AI can identify closeted people from public data? — PierceLilholt · 2026-10-29
- AI Social Scientists in Secure Enclaves Proposed to Reconcile Privacy and Discovery — RobbWiller · 2026-10-29
- Designers rue how empathy maps and personas gave way to one-shotting UIs with AI — round · 2026-10-29
- Rereading Xerox PARC's 1982 Star UI paper for the generative UI era — round · 2026-10-29