CS professor: if you never learned to write well yourself, how can you judge LLM-assisted papers?
CSProfKGD · x · 2026-10-28
A CS professor recalls his PhD supervisor's advice: read the conference version of a paper before the journal version, since journal versions often become overly formal and lose the original's intuition.
He draws a parallel to today's flood of LLM-generated writing — little intuition, excessive formality, no regard for succinctness, with some papers and blogs going on for pages without saying much.
He isn't against LLMs for writing, but worries the next generation may never develop the skills and judgment to steer them effectively: 'How can you recognize good scientific writing if you've never learned to produce it yourself?'
More from AGI Musings
- Max Tegmark discusses AI manipulation and machine rights with psychology PhD — tegmark · 2026-10-28
- Writers accused of sounding like AI — podcast asks if literary sameness is the real culprit — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-28
- AI Researcher on the Job Market Reflects on the Art of Problem Selection — simi_97k · 2026-10-28
- Yearn deposits fell 98% from $6.9B peak — agents make switching free, and loyalty toast — LexSokolin · 2026-10-28
- AI-driven cyber attacks may create huge demand for AI-assisted cyber defense — gleech · 2026-10-28
- Scott Barry Kaufman launches Human Potential Lab podcast, ep 1 asks what it's like to be an AI — PeterBowdenLive · 2026-10-28