Law firm AI debate: local-only Kimi/DeepSeek vs Harvey's portfolio strategy
ivan_bezdomny · x · 2026-10-28
A report claims a top law firm cut off Harvey and all Claude/OpenAI API calls, now running Kimi and DeepSeek locally on owned GPUs. Harvey's camp pushes back: Latham, for instance, buys GPUs while deploying Harvey firm-wide, arguing the real question is how heavily a firm invests in AI — a portfolio approach across vendors, labs, clouds and open source — rather than a binary build-vs-buy choice.
More from Companies & People
- Nathan Lambert: an effective org is worth multiples in compute for training frontier models — natolambert · 2026-10-28
- Nous Research sees nonstop signups after integrating Memelord's MCP — NousResearch · 2026-10-28
- Anthropic disclosure: no insurer, or even the whole industry, could cover catastrophic AI risk — wfithian · 2026-10-28
- One teacher becomes her whole network's 'FDE' after learning Claude for teaching tools — BenBajarin · 2026-10-28
- Dario: Those who called his GPT-2 fears 'pseudoscience' in 2019 now all apply to AI labs — irinarish · 2026-10-28
- After mom's missed cancer diagnosis, founder builds AI agents for patient follow-up — aakashgupta · 2026-10-28