Study with 293 writers: AI boosts quality but erodes collective novelty
petesena · x · 2026-10-27
A study of 293 writers found that those allowed to request up to 5 story ideas from AI produced stories rated by readers as more creative, better written, and more enjoyable. But when compared side by side, the AI-assisted stories were more similar to each other — the researchers call it "losing collective novelty."
The most counterintuitive finding: the least creative writers gained the most, while the most creative barely moved. AI raises the floor for everyone at once — and your competitors now stand there too.
Practical fix: write your own idea before opening the tool — have a thought before asking the machine for one.
More from AGI Musings
- Binmore's prescient warning that "Bayesianism will roll on regardless" resurfaces in AI debate — RichardMCNgo · 2026-10-28
- UC Berkeley math prof stops grading for correctness, gives credit just for turning in homework — Polymarket · 2026-10-28
- General robots today are magical toddlers: Formic and Matter on the valley of death — AnneliesGamble · 2026-10-28
- After42: experts rate 45 of 135 AI-proposed research questions genuinely interesting — james_y_zou · 2026-10-28
- Mantic forecasts open-weight models 9 months behind frontier in offensive cyber capability — tshevl · 2026-10-28
- Reframe: the people getting most out of AI are those who can define good work — brandon_galang · 2026-10-28