Pathology foundation models hit AUROC 0.90 vs ResNet50's 0.81
maier_ak · x · 2026-10-27
From the same TUM study: foundation models clearly beat a ResNet50 baseline (AUROC 0.90 vs 0.81). Averaging the best five models adds little — 0.901 to 0.907 for subtyping — with models selected on the same cross-validation used to evaluate them.
Related event: TUM Benchmarks 19 Pathology Foundation Models on Barrett's Esophagus(5 posts)→
More from Research
- S3AC: Shanghai AI Lab's Stabilized Actor-Critic Method for LLM Long-Chain Reasoning — Shanghai-AI-Laboratory · 2026-10-27
- Skill∞: Recursive Self-Improvement Where Agents Optimize Their Own Optimization Skills — NationalUniversityofSingapore · 2026-10-27
- 229k-sample replication of Cohere's Qwen 3.8 malicious PUT claim raises more questions — builderjaydub · 2026-10-27
- AFROSCOPE identifies 640 African languages, beats frontier LLMs' 47.4 F1 with 97.9 — mageed · 2026-10-27
- Physicist on OpenAI's math result: it's mathematical physics, not theoretical physics — skdh · 2026-10-27
- Mechanistic Interpretability and Fast Memory Recall Are the Same Problem — mayfer · 2026-10-27