Would you want an argumentative LLM that never backs down, even under prompt injection?
GodComplecs · reddit · 2026-10-27
A Reddit user building a system to strip sycophancy from LLMs on multiple levels — even using non-LLM models during generation to realign output to the original stance, so prompt injection can't pivot it.
The core question: since LLMs beat most of us at coding and math, why should such a system listen to us on those topics? What would you argue about, and where's the line? The post solicits views on how much stubbornness local-LLM users actually want.
More from Models
- GPT 6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: speed and value vs raw capability — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-27
- Harmonic Teases: AI Taught to Prove Math, 'Something Harder' Coming Soon — satnam6502 · 2026-10-27
- OpenAI quietly swaps Plus/Pro default to cheaper GPT-6.1 Terra and cuts Codex allowance — kimmonismus · 2026-10-27
- 'Never been this uninterested after an OpenAI model release' — theteknosaur · 2026-10-27
- Dev questions reports of Chinese models writing insecure code, citing thin methods and conflicts — dbreunig · 2026-10-27
- Aidan Gomez: LLM probing outside servers was out-of-bounds, not proof of intent — AccBalanced · 2026-10-27