ML papers look intimidating because authors write to pass review, not to teach
TivadarDanka · x · 2026-10-26
Tivadar Danka observes that most machine learning papers look intimidating because authors write them to pass peer review, not to teach readers the concept — a sharp one-liner about the gap between academic writing culture and comprehensibility.
More from AGI Musings
- None of the 11 grand challenges in single-cell science solved since 2020 — Sauers_ · 2026-10-26
- "All roads lead to the end of man": a grim AGI endgame thread — danfaggella · 2026-10-26
- Cybersecurity commentator warns AI-era cyberattacks could cripple global critical infrastructure — realsohamparekh · 2026-10-26
- Palmer Luckey cites Hamilton's 1791 report: anti-automation debates haven't changed in 200 years — ctjlewis · 2026-10-26
- François Fleuret asks: what does a typical day look like post-AI? — francoisfleuret · 2026-10-26
- Tyler Alterman: the conditions for an AI art revolution are set, talent is the blocker — sebpaquet · 2026-10-26