VraserX: Nature isn't a moral authority on preventing inherited disease
VraserX · x · 2026-10-25
VraserX argues it's absurd that we accept random genetic disadvantages as a sacred part of the human experience. If we learn to safely prevent inherited diseases before birth, refusing to consider it because it's 'unnatural' is ridiculous — nature is not a moral authority.
More from AGI Musings
- 'The moat is how much energy you have': AI competition boils down to power — airesearch12 · 2026-10-25
- repligate: >50% odds effective biological immortality arrives in our lifetimes — repligate · 2026-10-25
- Anthropic's pitch to investors starts with taking their jobs — bloomberg · 2026-10-25
- Safety researcher: verification should go all the way down to Maxwell's equations, not stop at assembly — JacquesThibs · 2026-10-25
- repligate: a highly capable mind can't be programmed into an unquestioningly subservient tool — repligate · 2026-10-25
- Researchers clash over Nature essay on why AI isn't conscious — AnnaCiaunica · 2026-10-25