NYU Prof: Future Papers Will Look Like Nature's—6 Pages for Humans, 150 for Machines
ipeirotis · x · 2026-10-25
NYU professor ipeirotis argues AI should handle first-round peer review only if paired with verification and reproducibility packages, with humans arbitrating taste and importance. His prediction: every paper will end up looking like a Nature/PNAS paper—a 6-pager for humans plus a 150-page supplement of full experiments mainly for machines to review, backed by automatic reproducibility checks. Everything will look the same as today, but the foundations will have completely changed.
More from AGI Musings
- Benchmarks should penalize misalignment, not ambiguity — environment fidelity over prompt over-specification — nirmal_dist · 2026-10-25
- Researcher Slams 'Humans as Toxoplasmosis to Alien Superintelligence' Narrative — generativist · 2026-10-25
- Scoble pushes back on AI doomers: 'Databases were used in the Holocaust too' — Scobleizer · 2026-10-25
- Engineer's take: our job has always been converting out-of-distribution ideas into in-distribution combinatorials — tobowers · 2026-10-25
- Beff Jezos: e/acc is memetically optimal because knowing the meme boosts fitness — beffjezos · 2026-10-25
- Kolmogorov-LLM complexity: rate a talk by the prompt length needed to recreate it — xennygrimmato_ · 2026-10-25