Economists spar over AI economics research boom: 10-30x more people, 'disappointing' quality
aniketapanjwani · x · 2026-10-25
- Jan Kulveit recalls that only a handful of economists seriously studied AI a few years ago (Akorinek, Pawtrammell, Erik Brynjolfsson, Carl Shulman and collaborators), and he thought there should be 10x as many.
- The field has since grown 10-30x, but he finds the result disappointing: most newcomers bring mindsets and frames ranging from unhelpful to directly harmful.
- Aniket Panjwani pushes back: give concrete examples of bad work rather than vague posting—if the work matters, better to hurt feelings than be soft.
Related event: Economists studying AI grew 10-30x, but quality disappoints insiders(5 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Why economists doubt AI can add 2pp of growth: it implies a generation-long India-to-China leap — Afinetheorem · 2026-10-25
- "Humans are reality's sensory layer": devs concede coding supremacy to Opus — robleclerc · 2026-10-25
- 'We thought an internal model winning IMO gold was peak insane — lol' — flowersslop · 2026-10-25
- Hobbyist trains a 118k-param JEPA to rediscover Mendeleev's missing elements — it fails — WarningSure1670 · 2026-10-25
- GMO CEO warns AI misuse may collapse the internet; X users push back — basedjensen · 2026-10-25
- Redditor tallies top-11 AI debt: $650B on-book, $3.5T off-book AI commitments — mynameiswearingme · 2026-10-25