Kimi k3.1's 'ridiculously bad' usage limits overshadow a strong model
haider1 · x · 2026-10-24
Developer haider calls Kimi's k3.1 usage limits "an absolute disaster": the model itself is good, but its quality is barely being discussed because the rate limits are so ridiculously bad. He argues Moonshot had a real chance to make k3.1 huge amid fierce Chinese model competition — and somehow screwed it up.
More from Models
- Leaked Claude UI screenshot shows unannounced Opus 5.5, Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 models — adonis_singh · 2026-10-24
- Developer on Claude Opus 5.5: "nothing else even comes close right now" — prasenx · 2026-10-24
- NYU/UT Austin paper: LLMs write convoluted text due to length-penalty optimization — menhguin · 2026-10-24
- 50 pre-ChatGPT novels tested against Pangram AI detector: zero false positives — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-24
- Seven independent tests find AI detector Pangram false-positive rate near zero — TuhinChakr · 2026-10-24
- Dev compiles incident-triage SOP into a fine-tuned 3B model: 93% accuracy at 8.4x lower cost — arpit_bhayani · 2026-10-24