Google's playbook: evaluating AI agents beyond the vibe check
bibryam · x · 2026-10-24
Google Developers Blog published a practical guide (paired with a 60-minute LangGraph eval pipeline build) on evaluating AI agents properly.
- Agents fail differently from software: they can loop, burn tokens, or hallucinate yet still return a polite, plausible final answer — quietly spiking cloud bills, exhausting API quotas, and triggering duplicate side effects.
- Classic trap: tweaking a system prompt to fix one workflow's edge case silently stops another workflow from calling a required tool.
- The core argument: evaluation is a progressive journey — any repeatable eval system beats a vibe check, and teams should integrate eval suites early in the development lifecycle rather than after a breaking prompt change.
More from coding & agent
- Codex Computer Use fails to capture Safari on Mac mini M4 with SCStreamErrorDomain -3811/-3812 — darkprinceimmortal · 2026-10-24
- Mubit trains small models from your own agent API traffic to cut cost and latency — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-24
- Heavy AI user: marketed automations are fragile, exhausting, and dumber than we admit — mrks86 · 2026-10-24
- Running CI weekly on dotfiles setup.sh inside a fresh Ubuntu container to catch breakage — 4310sy · 2026-10-24
- Codex CLI's hidden remote-control feature praised as better than Claude Code's — antirez · 2026-10-24
- PWAs can't use foldable screens on the Duo yet, but two Chrome flags unlock the APIs — mitsuhiko · 2026-10-24