Kimi K3.1 falls short of benchmarks in hands-on testing, says KOL
DeryaTR_ · x · 2026-10-24
DeryaTR, who earlier hailed Kimi K3.1 Pro's SOTA-level benchmarks, reports that in his private testing K3.1 falls short of its scores: clearly behind Opus 5.5, Astra, and Gemini Argon in coding, with Opus 5.5 somehow cheaper via subscriptions for the same projects. He is disappointed the benchmarks didn't translate to real performance.
More from Models
- humans& ships collaborator model Ampersand, social product Boba, and open-sources 10% FTL decode speedup — ericzelikman · 2026-10-24
- Nat Eliason: Blind test 'OVERWHELMINGLY' picks Argon's writing, wants it to rewrite everything — nateliason · 2026-10-24
- GPT-6 Astra solves 49 of 50 research-level physics problems, catches experts' own errors — MoonL88537 · 2026-10-24
- ClaudeAI weekly: silent safety filters, vanishing usage limits, and the Opus 5.5 'nerf' myth — ClaudeAI-mod-bot · 2026-10-24
- Anthropic investigates elevated errors on Claude Fable 5.1 — ClaudeAI-mod-bot · 2026-10-24
- ISTA-DASLab ships GSQ-RCO quantized DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash GGUFs, llama.cpp support still pending — Gold_Coconut9777 · 2026-10-24