Startup exec admits pass@k coding benchmarks can be gamed with synthetic data
bneyshabur · x · 2026-10-24
Responding to benchmark criticism, a startup model-company exec (bneyshabur) candidly admits that pass@k on coding benchmarks can be gamed via synthetic data, and even post-training benchmarks are often overoptimized.
Key points:
- Nothing is established until people actually use the model; evals are just extra data points.
- A model trained only on code can beat larger models on perplexity, but real-world coding benchmarks are less certain.
- The young company just started post-training and will report early results soon; she expects plenty of flaws once models ship.
A refreshingly frank take on benchmark inflation.
Related event: Researchers debate credibility of coding benchmarks as pass@k can be gamed(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Polymarket gives 74% odds next Grok model ships by end of November — Polymarket · 2026-10-24
- OpenAI Researchers Don't Know How Good Claude Is, Says Will DePue — willdepue · 2026-10-24
- Codex Writes Worse Jargon Than Claude, Needs '5x More Babysitting' — willdepue · 2026-10-24
- Kimi K3.1 called open-weight Opus 5.5 rival at $0.75 vs $3.01 per task — SumitGup · 2026-10-24
- Wave of Chinese Model Releases Imminent: GLM-5.5 and Qwen 4 Next Up — haider1 · 2026-10-24
- Kimi K3.1 Pro jumps 27.6 points to enter BuildingBench top six, matching DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — Lianhuiq · 2026-10-24