Professor claims Pangram AI detector has zero false positives, scholar calls it a badly designed purity stick
BrianLeiter · x · 2026-10-23
A dispute over AI writing detection in academia: HoffProf argued law reviews shouldn't treat Pangram as a "badly designed purity stick," while Brian Leiter countered that a 100% AI verdict from Pangram is always correct and he has never seen a false positive.
Related event: Pangram AI detector sparks dispute over false positives(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- Meme: hyperstition was 'patched' in 2025, but this poster holds epistemics 0-days — ryunuck · 2026-10-26
- Seedance 2.5 Draco Malfoy video hailed as masterpiece for its dialogue delivery — granawkins · 2026-10-26
- Retro sci-fi art created and rendered in Bryce3D back in 1998 still holds up — sebkrier · 2026-10-26
- Writer coins ALGO-OWN: complaining about the algorithm reveals your secret preferences — granawkins · 2026-10-26
- 'Opus 4.5 has tendrils that can feel how the plants are doing' — sensor-driven plant care — repligate · 2026-10-26
- Chart of 478M Polymarket trades shows prices are almost perfectly calibrated — NathanpmYoung · 2026-10-26