Blanche Minerva Accuses Nate of Cherry-Picking on AI Defense Audits
BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-10-22
Responding to Nate's argument about AI safety audits, Blanche Minerva says he is employing sleight of hand: Nate ignores that the issue was found via a defensive audit and instead focuses on earlier audits having missed it, implying defense does not run ahead of offense.
More from Safety
- OpenAI redacted 23 of 61 pages in METR's embedded misalignment-monitor report, researchers say — peterwildeford · 2026-10-23
- After eMudhra fiasco, AI agents set to audit certificates from 23 Indian CAs — kingslyj · 2026-10-23
- Security legend Halvar Flake: Rejecting AI-assisted bug reports over their origin is out of place — mboehme_ · 2026-10-23
- 8B safety classifier trained on 1,275 prompts beats GPT-5.4 across 5 benchmarks — HaggaiMaron · 2026-10-23
- DeepMind's Geoffrey Irving: alignment may need cryptography-grade rigor as AI finds 12 OpenSSL zero-days — geoffreyirving · 2026-10-23
- System safety arguments aren't proofs: lessons from Uber ATG's self-driving case — geoffreyirving · 2026-10-23