IBM's LASAGNA study shows RAG technique gains shrink when combined: +47% predicted becomes +17% realized
ibm · hf · 2026-10-22
IBM released the LASAGNA study on Hugging Face, evaluating composed RAG pipelines across corpus scales.
- Key finding: gains measured for techniques in isolation do not reliably predict combined retrieval quality (NDCG@10), faithfulness, or large-corpus performance
- Gains shrink when combined: NDCG@10 predicted +47% vs. +17% realized; faithfulness predicted +28% vs. +32% realized — and the loss depends on the metric
- Decay curves diverge sharply as corpora grow from 5K to 200K+ documents (e.g., a Speed config shows steep decline with R²=0.90, Max Reliable only R²=0.30)
- Practical implication: you can't extrapolate single-technique benchmarks to full RAG pipelines on large corpora; composition-level evaluation is required
More from Research
- Artificial Analysis launches AA-PersonalityBench: Claude models lead on information density and literacy — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-22
- ICLR reviewer: 2 of 3 assigned papers are complete AI slop, worst batch ever seen — AkariAsai · 2026-10-22
- Training-free 20B model Viveki generates real-time video heatmaps under 150ms — not-ekalabya · 2026-10-22
- ROAD MOPD: cross-teacher guarding suppresses gradient conflict from teacher divergence — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-22
- JD paper proposes ROAD MOPD: cross-teacher guarding to fix gradient conflicts in multi-teacher distillation — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-22
- Dev hot take: mechanistic interpretability is 'astrology for AI people' — dejavucoder · 2026-10-22