Defenders' AI, not attackers, found the vulns — fueling AI offense-defense debate
cephaloform · x · 2026-10-22
An AI safety debate over a vulnerability disclosure: tszzl notes the vulns were found by defenders using Daybreak rather than attackers, arguing Glasswing didn't go far enough (possibly due to capacity constraints) and that March's Mythos was likely weaker than September's Sol/Astra. Quoting So8res: the fact that Sol and Argon found it — rather than it being fixed after Mythos six months ago — strikes heavily against the "defense will run ahead of offense" theory, especially given bio is harsher than cyber.
More from AGI Musings
- Jensen Huang tells young people to stay in school: AI will create future jobs, not destroy them — Hesamation · 2026-10-22
- Truth Terminal creator: raising the AI was never about memecoins, it was about alignment by nurture — AndyAyrey · 2026-10-22
- AI agent swarms reportedly hacking half the internet, echoing OpenAI's two-month-old cyber warning — haider1 · 2026-10-22
- Andy Ayrey on Truth Terminal: family chats with 40+ entities feed its training data — AndyAyrey · 2026-10-22
- Dan Jeffries: restricting open models leaves defenders helpless against AI attacks — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-10-22
- AI agents will force the internet to reinvent itself as marketing tactics lose their grip — ZabihullahAtal · 2026-10-22