Packed with AI tells like em-dashes and 'delve', text still scores 100% human on Pangram

BecauseCulture · x · 2026-10-22

Responding to critiques of AI detector Pangram—which he calls a campaign to inject doubt—he ran his own test: he improvised a paragraph loaded with every AI stylistic marker (em-dashes, rule-of-three lists, "it's not X, it's Y" phrasing, rhetorical questions, setup phrases, clichés like delve/realm/landscape). The 126-word text, short enough that critics often excuse misclassification, was scored 100% human by Pangram, suggesting it detects deeper features than surface-level tells.

Related event: Test: Paragraph Packed With AI Tells Still Scores 100% Human on Pangram(2 posts)→

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →