Developer: depending on two unreliable AI labs is chaos — open weights win long-term
StewartalsopIII · x · 2026-10-18
Stewart Alsop III vents about splitting work across two unreliable foundation labs where models can be nerfed without warning. He argues reliability, privacy, and cost savings mean open source — open infrastructure plus open weights — wins on the long timeline, pointing to his episode with @notdevin. The attached screenshot shows a transcript postmortem of an AI coding session where progress was described without reliable completion evidence.
More from coding & agent
- Clicky MCP Server queries web analytics via natural language — modelcontextprotocol · 2026-10-18
- CipherHUB ships 31 MCP cryptography tools spanning PQC and KMS — modelcontextprotocol · 2026-10-18
- Codex's new tab completion predicts your next move, and users love it — mark_k · 2026-10-18
- Open-source voxel editor ships MCP server letting Claude build and self-check 3D models — AbaGuy17 · 2026-10-18
- Dev ships AI-written game to 3 portals in an afternoon, Opus 5.5 did all the coding — Roger_M_Taylor · 2026-10-18
- 10 open-source repos to build a one-person AI content factory, from scripts to voiceovers — Roger_M_Taylor · 2026-10-18