If superhuman reasoners can clean up Lean proofs, why not let them audit weights for alignment?
akbirthko · x · 2026-10-17
A poster draws an analogy: if we expect superhuman reasoning models to turn impenetrable Lean dumps into clear theories mathematicians can use, why not expect the same for mech interp and alignment — i.e., letting large models analyze the weights directly. Playful tone, but it touches a real alignment debate about models auditing themselves.
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI's mass math-solutions dump slammed for not warning mathematicians first — RileyRalmuto · 2026-10-17
- willcb: Extreme Capital Concentration and Agent Legal Personhood Are Humanity's Biggest Risks — willcb · 2026-10-17
- Jensen Huang on Lex Fridman: build the flywheel, don't just block chip exports — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-17
- Knowing what to ask and how to judge answers is the intelligence that matters — vasuman · 2026-10-17
- iMessage May Be the Most Sensitive Social Graph, and AI Agents Are Moving In — signulll · 2026-10-17
- The Tech-Wise Family's 10 principles for keeping tech from replacing family life — nwilliams030 · 2026-10-17