Researcher Argues Conferences Should Desk-Reject Far More Papers as Flooding Strains Reviews
boknilev · x · 2026-10-16
A debate about surging paper submissions at top ML conferences: Yoav Artzi argues flooding remains a strategy and the stress on the reviewing system is underestimated; boknilev responds that no single solution suffices and that many more papers should be desk-rejected, suggesting a survey on the question.
Related event: Top Conference Paper Flood Strains Peer Review(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Transforming quadruped robot runs on real hardware: per-pose RL policies in Isaac switched on morph — _Stocko_ · 2026-10-16
- KinoGen synthesizes robot loco-manipulation reference motions directly via kinematically grounded video generation — ChongZzZhang · 2026-10-16
- Science Robotics paper introduces F³, predictive event-based vision beyond optical flow — CSProfKGD · 2026-10-16
- VideoGen-Agent: An 8B Multimodal Agent Turns Video Generation Into a Tool-Use Loop — jiqizhixin · 2026-10-16
- Comprehension Audits: New Paper Proposes a Gate for AI-Written Code at Frontier Labs — ronbodkin · 2026-10-16
- Not Boring #215: Cammarata's Clean Networks Claim, Tesla's Flying Roadster, Tau Cut 73% — Not Boring (Packy McCormick) · 2026-10-16