Researcher: ML labs' authorship practices violate Cambridge, Harvard and Nature rules
skoularidou · x · 2026-10-16
Researcher skoularidou argues that per authorship guidelines from Cambridge, Harvard, MIT, Nature and Science, funding or providing HPC without intellectual contribution does not qualify for authorship — meaning many prolific PIs in ML and computational biology would/should be credited on less than 10% of the papers they claim to co-author annually over the past decade.
Related event: Researcher Slams Authorship Practices in ML Academia(2 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- 'Claude is an incredible model' — users say Anthropic is pulling ahead of OpenAI — iruletheworldmo · 2026-10-16
- Accenture caps employee Claude spending at $29/month — LinkedInNews · 2026-10-16
- Ex-Apple engineer recounts 6 years on Siri, from QA tooling to offline Siri — jdluk87 · 2026-10-16
- Chile's C³ index: 65% of firms train staff on AI but only 8% use it to innovate — robertonappe · 2026-10-16
- Musk teases "crazy stuff" at Tesla event, needs audience to prove it's not AI — XFreeze · 2026-10-16
- Synthwave is tech's current aesthetic, from Tesla Roadster to TBPN intros — granawkins · 2026-10-16