CHI reviewer laments: papers' Discussion sections now cite nothing
IanArawjo · x · 2026-10-16
HCI researcher Ian Arawjo, while reviewing CHI submissions, found that many papers' Discussion sections contain zero citations and make no effort to situate findings in prior literature — some merely restate or pile on new results. Even the better papers fall into this trap, prompting him to ask whether CHI writers have forgotten how to write a Discussion.
More from Research
- Survey: AI agent evaluation is getting realistic but still fails to measure safety and reliability — burkov · 2026-10-16
- COVA-SFT dataset trains models to solve text problems with visual chain-of-thought — yoavartzi · 2026-10-16
- USTC paper uses speculative sampling to cut latency in interactive video generation — ustc · 2026-10-16
- Tsinghua's CoTranslator distills reverse CoT to boost 4B model math scores — Tsinghua · 2026-10-16
- Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna on AI's role in science in Big Think interview — ChiaraStellata · 2026-10-16
- DIY benchmark ranks 18 models on subjective judgments, GLM-5.3 tops consensus match — arkuto · 2026-10-16