DeepSeek V4.1F serving is far cheaper than rivals — and DS deliberately overprices its tokens

teortaxesTex · x · 2026-10-16

Citing tphuang's observation that Tencent and Zhipu both jammed up almost immediately hosting DeepSeek V4.1F — leaving them entirely reliant on DeepSeek's own servers — teortaxesTex argues the root cause is economics: serving V4.1F is much cheaper than any competing model, and the stack is better too. The gap is more drastic than API prices suggest, because DeepSeek doesn't want to dedicate much capacity to inference and deliberately overprices its tokens to curb demand. He quips: if Zhipu can't handle it with a 100k-GPU cluster, how is DeepSeek managing it?

Original post →

More from Infra

Infra channel →