CHI Reviewer: AI Slop Is Real, but Unusually Rigorous Papers Still Getting Through
IanArawjo · x · 2026-10-15
CHI reviewer Ian Arawjo pushes back on claims that AI has killed peer review: this year's submissions include some unusually rigorous, exciting, and non-intuitive papers. AI-written slop is far from absent, but good research continues to get written and submitted regardless.
More from AGI Musings
- AI will make many discoveries for us, but adversarial domains like soccer will thrive — natanielruizg · 2026-10-16
- MIT's Buehler on AI as a new language of science: superintelligent partners and executable papers — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-10-16
- SEO visibility now tracks impressions, not clicks, as AI Overviews eat traffic — lilyraynyc · 2026-10-16
- Google white paper: AI river-flood forecasts 7 days out for 2B+ people, FireSat wildfire tracking — ymatias · 2026-10-16
- Polymarket odds: Only 10% chance US enacts AI safety bill by end of 2026 — Polymarket · 2026-10-16
- Intelligence is proportional to data: reorder tasks by data volume and the jagged frontier becomes a spiral — sebkrier · 2026-10-16