Integer multiplication repo becomes an agent harness benchmark — and collaboration loses

iskander · x · 2026-10-14

RohanArun and colleagues found the integer multiplication optimization repo doubles as a new benchmark for agent harnesses: rewind to an older, easier branch, then pit harnesses/prompts against each other to see who pushes the frontier fastest. Forcing genuinely novel solutions makes it ungameable.

The counterintuitive finding: sharing context and collaborating is bad. A 1-vs-2-vs-3-vs-4 agent matrix shows a single agent submitted in 5m16s with zero handoffs, while multi-agent setups were slower and far more token-hungry (one 2-agent run hit a 60-minute cap). Parallel independent agents won — possibly explaining why swarms were favored for the Navier–Stokes solution.

Contamination controls matter: inspect traces for web search, disable it, and ensure checkpoints don't include published solutions. Results are being scaled up. Community auto-research progress since 10/11 is +28.9%, with 85 first-time PR contributors in the last 4 hours.

Original post →

More from coding & agent

coding & agent channel →