Researcher revises skepticism of Pangram AI detector: false positives extremely low
lxrjl · x · 2026-10-13
In a discussion prompted by David Krueger asking how reliable Pangram is, lxrjl says the AI text detector's false positive rate appears extremely low. He initially dismissed Pangram after trivially bypassing early versions, but now thinks that skepticism was misplaced: most people never attempt circumvention, and in important contexts you must win the repeated game — fooling all future versions of Pangram is hard.
Related event: Skeptic Revises View: AI Detector Pangram Shows Very Low False Positives(2 posts)→
More from Models
- DeepMind open-sources 'cryptids': Turing machines with Lean proofs of famous conjectures — gaganghotra_ · 2026-10-13
- Hybrid fine-tuned BERT + LLM pipeline lost its edge to new frontier models — rajistics · 2026-10-13
- Prediction: Opus 5.5 will run locally on a single 24GB GPU within 8 months — TheZachMueller · 2026-10-13
- Gemini Nearly Absent from LM Arena Coding Top 15 as Claude and GPT Dominate — Full_Piano_3448 · 2026-10-13
- 7 cheap Flash models benchmarked: can they handle daily tasks and coding? — karminski3 · 2026-10-13
- Grok Is Now in Every Group Chat — and It'll Roast You With a Generated Portrait — JasonBotterill · 2026-10-13