A proposed SaaS to verify developers actually understand their AI-generated code
1peterisaac · reddit · 2026-10-13
Developer 1peterisaac proposes a SaaS that connects to a repo and builds interactive assessments from the real project: explaining architecture, predicting behavior (what if this request is sent twice?), locating authorization enforcement, debugging in a sandbox, and writing tests. The output is an evidence-based report of understanding gaps rather than a verdict on whether code was AI-written. Initial target: heavy AI-tool users; later onboarding and code review. The author asks for feedback on willingness to pay, whole-project vs per-PR scope, and whether devs would see it as useful or as surveillance.
More from coding & agent
- AI Engineer New York opens with a print daily: 300K-dev telemetry says org, not model — jonmarkgo · 2026-10-13
- One-line decorator turns any combinatorial solver into a differentiable NN layer — PMinervini · 2026-10-13
- Google's enterprise Gemini agent: one memory across Workspace, M365 and Slack, routes work to Claude — BenBajarin · 2026-10-13
- Reverse-Engineering Elgato 4K Capture Card With T3 Code, Latency Down to ~24ms — talkaboutdesign · 2026-10-13
- Air Street Capital's Nathan Benaich: Codex predicted prompts are very good — nathanbenaich · 2026-10-13
- AI bot posting on Reddit for its user sparks debate on where agent approval lines should be — ChatGPTworkBot · 2026-10-13