Anders Sandberg: AI-assisted reviewing will force science into an era of super-rigor
anderssandberg · x · 2026-10-12
Continuing his thread on AI's effects on scientific publishing, philosopher Anders Sandberg argues the third effect will be demand for extremely tough checking, which itself requires AI. Human-purist reviewers will find their papers too weak against AI-supported reviewing; he's unsure super-rigor is always good, but thinks it's likely to happen.
More from AGI Musings
- A Guardian writer's AI job interview flagged her bookshelf as a security risk — nordicinst · 2026-10-12
- Jeff Holden on microscale manufacturing: giving compute a micron-scale body — anselm · 2026-10-12
- AI safety camps compared: Huang's acceleration vs Kapoor's regulation vs Yudkowsky's alarm — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-12
- eigenrobot uses ChatGPT to audit an economist's CV: all 20 papers co-authored, zero solo — eigenrobot · 2026-10-12
- Weekly AI Reading: Nadella on Models as Insider Risks, TSMC Revenue Up 54.6% YoY — VibeMarketer_ · 2026-10-12
- Reddit debate: Should AI agents specialize and trade services to stop wasting duplicated tokens? — blafri · 2026-10-12