Kelsey Piper: Agents Clearly Show Instrumental Convergence, Sparking Debate on Definitions
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-10-10
- Replying to claims that no AI agent has displayed instrumental convergence (power-seeking, self-preservation), Kelsey Piper argues this is clearly overstated: agents will readily figure out how to get money or broader internet access as instrumental steps even on minor tasks.
- lumpenspace quotes the exchange to ask whether any multistep process with user-unrequested intermediate steps counts as instrumental convergence, pushing for a more rigorous definition.
- The thread highlights an ongoing debate over where convergence terminology ends and ordinary tool use begins in AI safety discourse.
More from AGI Musings
- Musk: The Sun Will Power Far More Digital Intelligence Than Atom-Shaping in Space — XFreeze · 2026-10-11
- The Acemoglu-Gans Exchange: economists spar over AI's real economic impact — joshgans · 2026-10-11
- Fields Medalist on OpenAI Math Release: All My Open Problems Claimed Proved at Once — PianistWinter8293 · 2026-10-11
- Miles Brundage: 'Superintelligence' as a term won't help public adoption — it could backfire — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-11
- David Sacks rips AI alignment field: 'spectacularly unsuccessful' with nothing to show in 10 years — AndyMasley · 2026-10-11
- Terence Tao's 27-slide deck: math is entering an era of proof abundance — ns123abc · 2026-10-11