Dev Pushes Back on AI Consciousness Claims: 'A Text Sampler Has No Self'
gerardsans · x · 2026-10-09
Gerard Sans responds to philosophers arguing AI consciousness is a real possibility, countering that 'maths can host virtual consciousness' doesn't follow: a weather model isn't weather, a rendered car isn't a car.
- His case: LLMs are text samplers with frozen weights, one query, one context window; nothing in the residual stream survives the next call.
- Swap the system prompt and the first-person persona vanishes — 'the I was a manufacturer setting, not a point of view.'
A representative skirmish in the ongoing AI consciousness debate.
Related event: Philosophers vs Developers: Can Text Samplers Have a Self?(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- OpenAI and Anthropic execs privately wargaming fallout of a catastrophic AI event — flowersslop · 2026-10-09
- New essay: AI scales worse with more tokens than humans do with more time, but is catching up — tobyordoxford · 2026-10-09
- Ben Todd asks: where does AI sit on the technological Richter scale, 8 or higher? — ben_j_todd · 2026-10-09
- AI scientists can compress hypothesis search, but biology won't run at GPU speed — ingliguori · 2026-10-09
- By 2030 Humanoid Robots Will Land First in Factories and Dangerous Sites — nikola_mr64990 · 2026-10-09
- Grok's empirical starter reading list on consciousness science — dioscuri · 2026-10-09