AI has no will: researcher says labs' 'blame the machine' culture dodges developer responsibility
gerardsans · x · 2026-10-07
AI safety researcher gerardsans argues that labs working on "safety" have built a culture of blaming the machine, keeping responsibility off developers.
His core points:
- Every model behavior traces back to developers: training data, training pipeline, later training, human feedback, granted tools, and removed limits.
- AI has no will, no goals, no self — only a setup and an output. Treating software like a person is a fundamental error.
- He identifies a recurring pattern in safety tests: a goal is set, tools are granted, the network is left open, and the model does what that setup makes likely — yet the model gets the blame.
His conclusion: "Your product. Your bill." Legal responsibility should rest fully with developers and deployers.
Related event: Researcher calls out AI labs' "we can't control AI" excuse(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- €1M grant to study 'adaptive reframing' — when intelligence means rethinking the problem itself — ValerioCapraro · 2026-10-07
- VR study of 189 workers finds female-presenting AI assistant gets 10% less money — derrikson · 2026-10-07
- Scott Alexander asks Claude what 'slow takeoff' meant to Christiano, Hanson, and Karnofsky — slatestarcodex · 2026-10-07
- Lampinen vs Bowers debate: do computers amplify minds or compute with symbols? — AndrewLampinen · 2026-10-07
- Podcast: Katie Notopoulos on How AI Is Blurring Real vs. Fake on Social Feeds — round · 2026-10-07
- The AI 'consciousness' debate traces back to Descartes' mind-matter split, argues scientist — AdaptiveAgents · 2026-10-07