Pilot study: AI agents rank all ICML 2026 papers as area chairs, and their 'research taste' differs from humans
ShayneRedford · x · 2026-10-07
A pilot study by seungonekim and Shayne Redford had AI agents act as area chairs and rank all ICML 2026 papers.
- Motivation: as agents take on more of the research process, it matters whether their 'research taste' matches ours.
- Preliminary finding: notable differences between agent and human rankings; full details not yet disclosed.
More from AGI Musings
- Video: The Metaphysical Impossibility of AI, on the Boundaries of Machine Minds — ReallyNotARussianSpy · 2026-10-07
- Superforecasters + AI only narrowly beat AI alone at forecasting — random_walker · 2026-10-07
- Matt Shumer's AI-era observation: ambitious friends work more, 9-5 friends coast — mattshumer_ · 2026-10-07
- A Claude-Built Model Estimates How Big a UBI Robots and AI Could Fund Without Inflation — Competitive_Travel16 · 2026-10-07
- Grady Booch: LLMs Are Single-Column Systems vs Brain's 2-4M Cortical Columns — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-07
- 100,000-Person AI March Organized via Assurance Contract Could Be Largest Ever — DKokotajlo · 2026-10-07