Who believes in fast foom but near-zero doom probability, with deep technical arguments?
burny_tech · x · 2026-10-06
burnytech asks: is anyone who assigns significant probability to fast foom while assigning basically zero probability to doom, and who has deep, technical, nuanced arguments for that combination? A rare pairing in AI safety discourse, the post seeks out argumentation for this unconventional stance.
More from AGI Musings
- Seb Krier's 20 AI takes: 'Nervousness as seriousness' is polluting tech discourse — joshua_saxe · 2026-10-06
- Ben Goertzel's Manifesto: Building Beneficial AGI Is the Most Important Work of Our Time — bengoertzel · 2026-10-06
- Ben Goertzel Launches BGI Commons With an AI 'Constitution' and Weekend AGI Hackathons — bengoertzel · 2026-10-06
- Ben Goertzel proposes purple-team hives of cybersecurity agents to complement correct-by-construction — bengoertzel · 2026-10-06
- Ben Goertzel unveils 'Distinction-Calculus', new math for forking, merging, self-modifying agent minds — bengoertzel · 2026-10-06
- Goertzel's step 8: agent hives tasked with upgrading their own intelligence against AGI metrics — bengoertzel · 2026-10-06