AI Doom Debate Turns Personal: Critic Calls Pauser Holly Elmore 'Objectively Unhinged'
teortaxesTex · x · 2026-10-04
The account teortaxesTex accuses AI doomer advocate Holly Elmore of going beyond standard x-risk concerns — treating people who simply expect AI to be a normal technology as if they were murdering her family — and calls her 'objectively unhinged.' A snapshot of the escalating culture war between AI safety hardliners and AI 'normalist' voices.
More from AGI Musings
- AI video is AI's second-biggest PMF as ReelShort heads to $1B+ revenue in 2026 — StewartalsopIII · 2026-10-04
- Sergey Karayev: Your Cells Don't Know You — And You Don't Know What You Comprise — sergeykarayev · 2026-10-04
- Reddit essay rebuts Hinton: no testable evidence AI already has subjective experience — WhoReallyKnowsThis · 2026-10-04
- If LLMs write most code, why not design a programming language just for AI? — MyBeardHasThreeHairs · 2026-10-04
- Whose AGI timeline is most accurate? Kurzweil vs AI 2027 vs Musk compared — shadowt1tan · 2026-10-04
- Against Hinton: sounding human and rogue agents aren't evidence of AI consciousness — WhoReallyKnowsThis · 2026-10-04