Systems neuroscience grew around the sensorimotor loop, argues neuroscientist
sreejan_kumar · x · 2026-10-04
In a discussion on intellectual lineages bridging brains and AI, the author argues motor control shouldn't be treated as a separate lineage: much of systems neuroscience grew around the sensorimotor loop—world → neural activity → action—and even Hubel & Wiesel's work fits that framing.
Related event: Systems neuroscience and the cognitive science bridge debate(2 posts)→
More from Research
- Richard Sutton praises PhD thesis on robots that keep learning after deployment — RichardSSutton · 2026-10-04
- CUHK's TimePrism accepted at ICLR 2026: probabilistic forecasting shifts from sampling to scenarios — jiqizhixin · 2026-10-04
- RL agent orchestrates LLM swarms to probe dark matter signatures in new AI-for-Science paper — DanielWhiteson · 2026-10-04
- Toy Lemma Proof Example Explains How RL Teaches LMs Long Reasoning Chains — AndrewLampinen · 2026-10-04
- What actually happened when Anthropic's Claude took on the Riemann Hypothesis — SammaVaco · 2026-10-04
- Continuous learning benchmark has models learn chess over 200 games — Elo barely improves — imjustnewatai · 2026-10-04