Blogger defends AI-generated adult content: harms no one, labels optional
JHochderffer · x · 2026-10-03
An X user lays out a two-part case for AI-generated adult content: first, it harms no one — and even for porn, it is morally better than involving real people; second, demand clearly exists, with millions of people (himself included) wanting it.
He would not object to an "AI generated" label at the bottom of the output, but is equally fine without one. He also frames calls to ban such content as being "on the wrong side of history" against innovation — a representative grassroots position in the ongoing debate over ethics and regulation of AI-generated media.
Related event: Debate Flares Over AI-Generated Adult Content(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Solo Devs With Agent Armies May Write All the Code, but Products Still Need Teams — bendee983 · 2026-10-03
- Will AI research access be locked behind special permissions? Open-source would fill the void — TinfoilTricorn · 2026-10-03
- e/acc case: cheap energy and affordable healthcare via AI, bans won't get us there — mark_k · 2026-10-03
- When LLMs can predict what you'll say before you say it: prediction, persuasion and lost autonomy — Namnagort · 2026-10-03
- MIT co-authored book charts eight years of tech worker organizing and backlash — nordicinst · 2026-10-03
- Ben Horowitz: Biggest personal agent win so far is canceling a NYT subscription — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-10-03