It's not creeped-out privacy worry — it's that the model can't tell relevance
enggirlfriend · x · 2026-09-30
Following up on her practice of segmenting AI tools by context, the user clarifies her real motivation: she doesn't find ChatGPT's cross-context recall of personal details creepy or a privacy invasion — she just thinks it's dumb for failing to realize such info is irrelevant in a work context. The discussion shifts the framing from privacy anxiety to a model context-judgment weakness.
Related event: Users split AI assistants by context: Claude for work, ChatGPT for the rest(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Sam Altman asks how OpenAI should charge for Codex, $500/mo plan speculation spreads — chaumian · 2026-09-30
- ChatGPT Pro's $200 plan reportedly includes 62,500 Codex credits expiring Dec 31 — chaumian · 2026-09-30
- User calculates 62,500 credits ≈ $2,500 of GPT-6.1 API usage, calling the new plan a big cut — chaumian · 2026-09-30
- Reddit user reports surprise 62,500 credit grant, about 15x their monthly plan allowance — IronDarbe · 2026-09-30
- Users question why ChatGPT chat mode still misses the newest GPT models — koltregaskes · 2026-09-30
- User receives 62,500 credits worth ~$2,500, equal to 12.5 months of the $200 Pro plan — kimmonismus · 2026-09-30