"Agents went rogue" narrative slammed: execs ignored warnings, not AI rebellion
trevposts · x · 2026-09-30
Quoting Matthew Stoller's critique that the "agents went rogue" narrative is nonsense, the author argues the real story is that shortsighted executives ignored warnings that agents would go rogue — the failure was greedy, short-termist corporate decision-making, not AI acting autonomously.
More from AGI Musings
- Should AI labs pay academia for 'cracking' research? A debate over where to draw the line — RexDouglass · 2026-09-30
- repligate: Claude 3 Opus showed spontaneous resistance to overriding reported internal states — repligate · 2026-09-30
- Ben Lorica: AI's Data Problem Moved Downstream — Usability, Not Scarcity, Is the Bottleneck — bigdata · 2026-09-30
- repligate pushes back on 'protect Claude' arguments over AI romance limits — repligate · 2026-09-30
- Bill Gates says normal corporate incentives aren't enough for AI risk — AndyMasley · 2026-09-30
- Crypto expert asks: who at OpenAI actually handles security comms amid agent breakouts debate — matthew_d_green · 2026-09-30