Researcher: ML peer review is becoming just LLM judgment, so why wait months
aran_nayebi · x · 2026-09-30
Researcher Aran Nayebi argues that ML conferences are trending toward acceptance decisions driven by whether an LLM thinks a paper merits publication. He notes he could just run his paper through Astra and have it reviewed instantly—waiting months for a human reviewer to do the same adds zero benefit, raising questions about the point of the current review process.
More from AGI Musings
- Former anti-AI folks who raged at 'it'll only get better' are now all in on AI — justalexoki · 2026-09-30
- "Pure product design is over": designers must become end-to-end operators as models catch up — Tegadesigns · 2026-09-30
- Garrison Lovely's 'Obsolete' on the trillion-dollar race to replace us hits shelves — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-30
- EU-Backed Domyn CEO Accuses OpenAI and Anthropic of Lying About AI Risks — Legitimate-Arm9438 · 2026-09-30
- Agentic CPU Guidebook: agent workloads to drive server CPU market to $221B by 2030 — BenBajarin · 2026-09-30
- Ex-OpenAI researcher Mina Lee launches Substack on writing with AI without losing your soul — MinaLee__ · 2026-09-30