Critic says AI doom rhetoric is an aesthetic choice, not persuasion
trevposts · x · 2026-09-28
trevposts argues that much AI-risk rhetoric amounts to "you can choose whether to believe AI would be dangerous, and isn't it more relaxing and aesthetic to believe it doesn't?" — rather than genuinely trying to persuade people it won't be dangerous.
More from AGI Musings
- "If my agents rob a bank and wire me $1M, that's fine, right?" — the agent liability question — generativist · 2026-09-28
- AI art objection is cognitive dissonance, argues researcher Blanche Minerva — BlancheMinerva · 2026-09-28
- Study: LLMs Can Infer Causal Structure From Distributional Semantics Alone — AndrewLampinen · 2026-09-28
- AI growth debate: Hanania predicts just 3.5% GDP bump in five years, drawing fire — QuintinPope5 · 2026-09-28
- Stop calling AI failures 'rogue' — they're foreseeable harms, argues Sigal Samuel — mmitchell_ai · 2026-09-28
- Blogger predicts all major US AGI labs will reach AGI in 2027, then ASI — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-28