'Stochastic parrot' debate reignites: researchers clash over the 2021 critique's relevance
FlorianGallwitz · x · 2026-09-27
A new round of the "stochastic parrot" fight: researcher Andrew Lampinen called the phrase "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing," arguing it reflects the original authors' own misunderstanding of language—the paper's core technical mistake.
Melanie Mitchell pushed back that this is a straw-person argument: the 2021 paper targeted LLMs of that era, not today's systems, which are complex software stacks with extensive post-training and external components. The exchange captures the ongoing dispute over whether the classic LLM critique still applies.
Related event: Melanie Mitchell Sparks Debate: Today's Systems Are Not LLMs(31 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- UK's new AI Economics Institute hiring up to 15 research economists — TaniaBabina · 2026-11-11
- Not Boring: the three arguments that AI isn't a bubble are exactly how bubbles form — Not Boring (Packy McCormick) · 2026-11-11
- Viral post: five years of 'maybe next year,' then 2026 arrived — hey_abusiddik · 2026-11-11
- Jeremy Howard: LLMs "cosplay understanding," like the man in Searle's Chinese room — Machine Learning Street Talk · 2026-11-11
- 'Chat with your data' misses the point — people want a smart coworker — vboykis · 2026-11-11
- Ben Todd: AI task time horizons appear superexponential in AECI, not just revenue — ben_j_todd · 2026-11-11