Melanie Mitchell backs claim that today's systems aren't really LLMs, citing original definition
MelMitchell1 · x · 2026-09-27
Santa Fe Institute professor Melanie Mitchell responded to Aidan Clark's claim that "what we have now are not LLMs," agreeing unless the term has been redefined. She argued the Stochastic Parrots paper used the original definition: a language model is a statistical model of language, not of all the extra content today's post-trained AI systems have absorbed. The exchange feeds into an ongoing debate about how far the LLM label has drifted from its technical meaning.
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus: Everyone would freak out if Chinese AI did what OpenAI is doing — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-27
- Judea Pearl's Caltech talk: Can Computers Have Free Will? — yudapearl · 2026-09-27
- Researchers debate interpretability as a hedge against latent reasoning architectures — ChrisGPotts · 2026-09-27
- Inside Berkeley's conference on whether AI can feel pain — and why one philosopher says hold off on AI personhood — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-27
- Terry Tao went from calling o1 a 'mediocre grad student' to fearing AI will devour math academia — aran_nayebi · 2026-09-27
- Tech insiders privately concede AI may 'kill billions' while the public assumes life goes on — birchlse · 2026-09-27