Following the Money Behind Claims That AI Safety Concerns Are a Funded Psyop
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-09-26
A new X thread investigates the wide network of accounts claiming that people raising AI concerns are pawns in a well-funded psyop by powerful interests. The author traced the money behind these campaigns and shared the findings; former OpenAI policy head Miles Brundage amplified it.
More from AGI Musings
- Not Boring: the three arguments that AI isn't a bubble are exactly how bubbles form — Not Boring (Packy McCormick) · 2026-11-11
- Viral post: five years of 'maybe next year,' then 2026 arrived — hey_abusiddik · 2026-11-11
- Jeremy Howard: LLMs "cosplay understanding," like the man in Searle's Chinese room — Machine Learning Street Talk · 2026-11-11
- 'Chat with your data' misses the point — people want a smart coworker — vboykis · 2026-11-11
- Ben Todd: AI task time horizons appear superexponential in AECI, not just revenue — ben_j_todd · 2026-11-11
- When AI becomes an oracle, what happens to mathematics? — stevenstrogatz · 2026-11-11