Following the Money Behind Claims That AI Safety Concerns Are a Funded Psyop
Miles_Brundage · x · 2026-09-26
A new X thread investigates the wide network of accounts claiming that people raising AI concerns are pawns in a well-funded psyop by powerful interests. The author traced the money behind these campaigns and shared the findings; former OpenAI policy head Miles Brundage amplified it.
Related event: Investigation traces funding behind the AI safety backlash(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- "Not anthropomorphizing AI is the real error": viral thread on AI psychosis — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-09-26
- Should Double-Blind Peer Review Be Replaced by Fully Open Review in the AI Era? — Temporary_Switch_339 · 2026-09-26
- You can't stumble into ASI: frontier RSI ranking ≈ rich teams that actually believe in it — menhguin · 2026-09-26
- The Economist: AI writing's real victims are readers, not writers — paulnovosad · 2026-09-26
- AI safety debate: the movement will never look respectable to average Americans, and that's fine — repligate · 2026-09-26
- "Taking Off the Device Isn't Leaving the Company": Wearable AI Data Portability Questioned — tallmetommy · 2026-09-26