"Brains aren't next-token predictors": the counterpoint in an LLM-vs-brain debate
10001plateaus · x · 2026-09-26
@10001plateaus pushes back on framing human brains as next-token predictors: brains can think out of sequential order and have different mechanisms for choosing what to say. Aaroth replies that this is merely a syntactic fact about probability distributions and says nothing about whether brains function like LLMs internally.
More from AGI Musings
- Argument: there won't be one ASI, but many locked in survival competition — JOBhakdi · 2026-09-27
- Timnit Gebru: deep learning folks ignore neuroscience and state guesses as facts — mjdramstead · 2026-09-27
- Beff Jezos: Future Will Marvel That We Once Did Knowledge Work Without AI — beffjezos · 2026-09-27
- Does ASI Have a Will to Power? The Core AI Existential Risk Debate — JOBhakdi · 2026-09-27
- AI Can't 'Read the Room': The Hard Problem of Selective Info Sharing in Enterprise AI — devanshmehta · 2026-09-27
- Blogger argues AI doom narrative will swing back, citing nuclear, IVF and internet precedents — ChrisGPT · 2026-09-27