Reproducibility study finds 63% of reproduced papers had at least one coding error
RexDouglass · x · 2026-09-26
- A replication study by I4Replication found that about 63% of reproduced articles had at least one coding error or statistical inconsistency.
- Most flagged cases were minor (59.5%), but 40.5% had issues that could affect estimates, standard errors, significance, or interpretation.
More from Research
- Biopharma Bench: agents complete only 8 of 71 real biopharma tasks, GPT-6 Astra leads — AllThingsApx · 2026-09-26
- Matryoshka Attribution finds neural network circuits via gradient descent, tops interpretability benchmark by 2.9x — stanfordnlp · 2026-09-26
- Anthropic's science blog shows Claude pulling off 'Nine Loops' particle physics calculations — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-26
- UniReps workshop invites NeurIPS rejects, deadline Oct 4 for Paris event — Pseudomanifold · 2026-09-26
- Creative Destruction Lab opens 15-year tech startup panel dataset to researchers — avicgoldfarb · 2026-09-26
- Building the next OCR benchmark: skalskip92 seeks hard samples from handwriting to technical drawings — BLUECOW009 · 2026-09-26