Wild ICML/NeurIPS score swings fuel calls for peer review's demise amid LLM reviews
tokenbender · x · 2026-09-26
A researcher's ICML scores swung 4442→5542→5541 before rejection, and NeurIPS 442→442 also rejected. tokenbender argues LLM-baked and LLM-reviewed conferences will only produce mass psychosis and kill creativity, praying for the death of traditional peer review.
More from Research
- Researchers teach LLMs to find interesting theorems, boosting interestingness 4.3x — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-26
- Anthropic: Claude solves nine-loop scattering amplitudes, breaking the eight-loop record — AnthropicAI · 2026-09-26
- Both "grep is all you need" and "BM25 is all you need" Papers Just Got Accepted — lintool · 2026-09-26
- Reasonable Team Publishes TLA+ Tutorial: Not a Silver Bullet, AI Agents Could Change That — fhuszar · 2026-09-26
- Bilevel optimization densifies scarce labels to fix OOD molecular property prediction (ICML WS 2025) — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-26
- Blender-generated datasets teach world models object permanence at 10k samples per task — _akhaliq · 2026-09-26